ECO is getting a little desperate in the transparency negotiations. Parties are continuing to repeat the same lines and positions they’ve shared since June 2019, and ECO isn’t completely sure if all Parties are eager to reach consensus on a robust set of decisions. Parties are still maneuvering over the structure of the texts rather than engaging on the technical aspects. ECO knows this can be part of the negotiating strategy, but it’s beyond time to move toward consensus.
It is baffling that after all the work and time to get here to Glasgow, Parties spent an hour yesterday arguing over the difference in status between informal notes from the May-June virtual SB and notes prepared here in Glasgow.
ECO knows the transparency negotiations are on very technical topics: tables, outlines, and training programs. But the enhanced transparency framework (ETF) is a central element of the Paris Agreement. The ETF will be how ECO knows whether we are on track to limit warming to 1.5°C. The ETF is how we know whether countries will meet the targets they have set out in their NDCs. The ETF is how we know whether countries meet the $100 billion per annum goal. The ETF will give us information about adaptation. The ETF will give us information on loss and damage. Those arguing against such transparency could be seen to have things to hide.
But the ETF is not just about international reporting. The ETF is about providing robust data, detailing how climate targets are implemented domestically, and translating climate action into a driver of development for communities and societies.
In the final decision, Parties must uphold the TACCC principles (transparency, accuracy, consistency, comparability and completeness). Simply, the ETF will tell us whether and how the Paris Agreement is working. So, roll up your sleeves and get it done.