Climate Action without a pulse: ACE in the hole or just another card in the climate deck? 

In the labyrinthine world of climate negotiations, where high stakes, higher temperatures, and the highest level of bureaucratic flair converge, there sits an unassuming champion— the Action for Climate Empowerment (ACE). Yes, ACE, that often overlooked yet curiously potent alphabet soup that promises to educate, engage, and empower. But does it? Or is it merely another decorative card in the climate action deck?

Let’s cut through the smog. ACE should be the heartbeat of climate strategy, pulsing through education, public awareness, and, dare we say, actual participation. But as our high-flying delegates debate the fate of our planet, ACE often finds itself shuffled to the bottom of the deck, peeked at with interest but rarely played with the gusto it deserves.

This year, amidst coffee-fueled side chats and a proactive ACE Dialogue, a revelation seemed to dawn—of course at glacial pace—that without funding and firm commitments, ACE is like a solar panel under a shade tree: optimistically placed but disappointingly underutilized. Funding is where the lofty ambitions meet the road, yet here we are, watching as financial disparities are glossed over with all the enthusiasm of a mandatory safety demonstration.

In a world where ‘engagement’ too often means ticking boxes and where ‘public participation’ looks suspiciously like an echo chamber, ACE’s potential for real, systemic change is being stifled. Civic space is shrinking, yet the space for empty rhetoric? Expanding faster than a hot air balloon in a heatwave.

So, what’s the real deal with ACE? Is it the secret weapon in our climate action arsenal, or just another bureaucratic tick-box, a footnote in the annals of climate history? As negotiations drag on, the powers should keep in mind that empowering the very people affected by climate policies is not just nice but necessary. After all, what’s the point of holding all these cards if we’re not willing to play them effectively? What is the point of identifying that ACE is underresourced if developed countries won’t even agree to talk truthfully about the financial gaps? 

At the end of the day, ACE might just be the ace up our collective sleeve. Or it could continue to be the low ranking card. Only time—and perhaps another round of negotiations—will tell.